About Scott Cleland
![]() |
|
You are hereAmazonSilicon Valley’s 6 Biggest Net Neutrality Fantasies – Special ReportSubmitted by Scott Cleland on Thu, 2014-07-24 16:12If Silicon Valley folks are indeed the smartest of the smart, how could they be so easily fooled on net neutrality? Normally smarts distinguish between what’s testable and real versus what is the pixie-dust of dreams. So where’s the real data and sound scientific thinking behind Silicon Valley’s grandiose net neutrality presumptions? Why isn’t Silicon Valley adhering to its own data-driven, scientific decision-making principles?
Summary of Silicon Valley’s 6 Biggest Net Neutrality Fantasies: NetCompetition Statement & Comments on FCC Open Internet Order RemandSubmitted by Scott Cleland on Fri, 2014-07-11 12:29
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE July 11, 2014 Contact: Scott Cleland 703-217-2407
Broadband Reclassification is a Problem Pretending to be a Solution; & Un-supported by the Facts, Unjustified on the Merits, & Unwise Given FCC’s Record of Title II Failures Networks Aren’t Free; Businesses Pay for Electricity, Water, Gas, Transport & Delivery Interconnection is Different for Internet than Railroads or Electricity – Part 55 FCC Open Internet Order SeriesSubmitted by Scott Cleland on Thu, 2014-06-26 15:38
Some things are way too important to let slip by uncontested. The FCC has asserted a foundational regulatory premise that warrants rebuttal and disproving, given that the FCC is considering if Internet access, and Internet backbone peering, should be regulated like a utility under Title II telephone common carrier regulation. In an important speech on Internet interconnection last month to the Progressive Policy Institute, the very able and experienced Ruth Milkman, Chairman Tom Wheeler’s Chief of Staff, asserted that “communications networks are no different” than railroad and electricity networks when it comes to interconnection. “… At bottom… the fact is that a network without connections and interconnections is one that simply doesn’t work. Disconnected networks do not serve the public interest.” Silicon Valley Naïve on Broadband Regulation -- 3 min video Cleland commentarySubmitted by Scott Cleland on Sun, 2014-06-15 10:19
Thanks and Kudos to Mike Wendy of Media Freedom for this <3 minute commentary (video here) about how naïve Silicon Valley is in pushing for broadband regulation that could easily boomerang and apply to core parts of Silicon Valley’s distribution and cloud businesses. They are living proof of the old adage: be careful of what you ask for, you may just get it. They also could find themselves getting acquainted with a new adage: live by three FCC votes, die by three FCC votes.
Exposing Netflix’ Biggest Net Neutrality Deceptions – Part 16 Netflix Research SeriesSubmitted by Scott Cleland on Thu, 2014-06-05 15:22
If Netflix’ position on net neutrality was justified on the merits, why does Netflix need to say so many deceptive things that are demonstrably untrue, in order to justify its case for its version of net neutrality? Google’s Title II Utility Regulation Risks – An Open Letter to InvestorsSubmitted by Scott Cleland on Tue, 2014-06-03 17:39Unregulated Google is increasingly pushing for maximal FCC net neutrality and price regulation of its direct broadband competitors, potentially via FCC reclassification of broadband as a Title II telephone utility service. Top Ten Reasons to Oppose Broadband Utility Regulation – Part 50 Open Internet Order SeriesSubmitted by Scott Cleland on Thu, 2014-05-29 08:55
Please see my latest Daily Caller op-ed: “Top Ten Reasons to Oppose Broadband Utility Regulation.” It provides a great overview of the best arguments why the FCC reclassifying broadband as a Title II monopoly telephone service, is a very bad idea.
*** FCC Open Internet Order Series Part 1: The Many Vulnerabilities of an Open Internet [9-24-09] Open Letter to Internet Association on Broadband Utility RegulationSubmitted by Scott Cleland on Mon, 2014-05-26 22:22
Dear Executives of Internet Association Companies, Have you thought through the global implications of your businesses’ public lobbying for regulating broadband like a public telephone utility? Possibly you are unaware that “The French government said it would push for a new European law later this year to classify Google and other Web giants like public utilities, forcing them to guarantee access to all services like phone operators. … We don’t want to become a digital colony of global Internet giants” said the French Economy Minister, per Wall Street Journal reporting. As members of the global Internet giant association, and as global companies with large majorities of your current or future revenues coming from overseas, it could be beneficial to better think through the global implications of your high-profile policy support for new broadband utility regulation in the U.S. Net Neutrality Rhetoric: “Believe it or not!”Submitted by Scott Cleland on Fri, 2014-05-16 11:51
With due credit to "Ripley's Believe it or Not!®," so much odd and bizarre is happening in Washington in the "name" of “net neutrality” that the topic calls for its own collection of: "Believe it or Not!®" oddities.
INTERNET FAST LANES:
Net Neutrality activists who have long condemned the FCC for not making the Internet fast enough now condemn the FCC for proposing to make the Internet faster!
Google and Amazon oppose the FCC enabling them to pay for fast-lane delivery of their online services when they both are launching very-costly, same-day, home delivery services!
NetCompetition Statement on FCC Open Internet NPRMSubmitted by Scott Cleland on Thu, 2014-05-15 12:54NetCompetition FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE May 15, 2014 Contact: Scott Cleland 703-217-2407
FCC Consideration of Title II Broadband Regulation is a Blueprint for Uncertainty Pages |