You are here Online Privacy
Submitted by Scott Cleland on Mon, 2007-10-01 10:39
http://washingtontimes.com/article/20070930/COMMENTARY/109300009/1012/commentary
Article published Sep 30, 2007
Ultimate Internet gatekeeper?
September 30, 2007
Scott Cleland - Imagine one company was allowed to become the world's de facto editorial filter by which Internet content gets found, the only revenue collector for most Web sites and the dominant gatekeeper for any business seeking to reach Internet users and Web sites.
Imagine further that one company had "private dossiers" on most all Internet users that could, with substantial accuracy, tell the company any individual's religion, politics, health status, income level, sexual preference, gender, age and personal secrets — and had an economic incentive to secretly exploit those individuals' private information for financial gain. Finally, imagine that company had little accountability to consumers, competition, regulators, or independent third-party oversight.
Submitted by Scott Cleland on Thu, 2007-09-20 10:59
The New York Times (and others) reported yesterday Google's announcement that it was launching a "Gadget ads" program which is essentially display-ad-serving to "widgets' which are essentially "mini-websites" within websites.
It is getting harder and harder for Google antitrust lawyers to argue with a straight face that Google does not compete in the market of "display-ad-serving" with DoubleClick.
- Google is the world leader in "serving":
- search text ads
- contextual ads;
- video display ads through YouTube,
- And is now entering:
- mobile ad- serving;
- and widget ad-serving to these mini-websites withing websites.
- Google's definition of "ad-serving" is increasingly becoming too-cute-by-half semantic wordplay and not a functional or factual definition.
Antitrust officials should ask Google if they are colluding with DoubleClick to not compete while the merger is pending.
Submitted by Scott Cleland on Fri, 2007-09-14 13:50
Google calling for global privacy standards is like the fox guarding the henhouse calling for better chicken wire standards.
In a public relations ploy, Google, is now calling for international privacy legislation; see AP's "Google launches global privacy crusade."
- It appears Google is finally cognizant that privacy is an issue they can no longer brush under the rug.
My analysis of Google's call for International privacy standards is that it is a transparent PR ploy to try and lead the protest march for the cameras while trying to distract people from the fact that the privacy "march" is actually heading directly towards Google headquarters.
Submitted by Scott Cleland on Thu, 2007-09-13 10:58
Submitted by Scott Cleland on Mon, 2007-09-10 12:12
Submitted by Scott Cleland on Thu, 2007-09-06 15:16
It is never a good omen for a merger's approval outlook, when EU antitrust authorities can't wait to investigate the impact of the merger and proactively inititiate their own antitrust investigation -- before their official process even gets started.
Google's antitrust lawyers have to be bummed by the development reported by Reuters that: "EU questions customers over Google-DoubleClick deal."
Submitted by Scott Cleland on Thu, 2007-09-06 13:02
The Financial Times had a noteworthy article about Google's role as an editor of content and defender of free speech -- when Google finds it convenient: "Thailand lifts Youtube ban after Google agrees to block some clips."
This article is an interesting juxtaposition to Google CEO Eric Schmidt's very recent comments on the importance of free speech at a speech before the Progress and Freedom Foundation.
-
"We need to defend freedom of speech as more speech comes on line. ...Let’s do this in the right way. Let’s preserve the openness and the freedom of speech principles. You could use Internet censorship, for example, as a non-tariff trade barrier, which we all need to fight because governments, especially non-U.S. governments, have an incentive to some degree to control the populations -- to do all the things that are obvious if you’re afraid of empowering your citizens."
The FT article is a good opportunity to review if Google's actions support Google's rhetoric when it comes to Google defending free speech...
Submitted by Scott Cleland on Wed, 2007-09-05 18:38
A major reason why the stakes are so high in the FTC's review of the Google-DoubleClick merger is how remarkably fast online advertising is overtaking other advertising industry segments that have been around for decades.
An important development occurred just before the long Labor day weekend that I didn't want people to miss. Media Daily News reported that: "Internet displaces radio as fourth largest ad medium."
Submitted by Scott Cleland on Fri, 2007-08-31 16:22
I always enjoy reading the Britain-based Economist's take on things American because they bring a detached, across-the-pond, critical perspective that often is very illuminating.
Relevant to Google-DoubleClick merger:
Submitted by Scott Cleland on Wed, 2007-08-29 18:50
Google openly represents its value in the marketplace as supplying users with "free" services: free search, free email, free docs/spreadsheet/other applications, free content, etc.
Pages
|